The charts show information concerning speed-camera use, together with statistics on road accidents, for the city of Melbourne.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart explains the number of speed cameras installed in Melbourne roads and corresponding percentage of accidents and death occurred
from the year 2002 to 2005. Although cameras are in place its their sole responsibilities to make sure safety driving and smoother travel experience.
Firstly for the year 2002, the number of cameras are 30, accidents reaches peak point and decreased to 3% and death rates are fluctuating and
stays at 0.8%. For year 2003, The cameras increased to 40, can see accidents are increased to 3.2% and death rates are decreasing and remains at 0.6%.
Secondly, for year 2004 the cameras are much increased to 70, Accident and death rates also rise to 3.7% and 1%. This is the first time
the death rates reaches this point. The cameras installed went up to 140 to make sure safety transport but the accidents steadily increasing and
reaches 3.5% which is a largest value. And lastly the death rates reaches to a maximum of 1.8% and sweep decreased to 1.2%.
Overall the death rates reaches a most point of 1.5% by end of 2004 and accidents to 3.3% by 2005.
The numbers are increasing throughout the year even though more camera numbers are in place, because of advanced motor cars and powerful vehicles. I think, The death rates will be decreased if police replaces them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-13 | ravitejacts | 56 | view |
- The diagram shows the production of hydroelectricity 56
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007. 84
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne (units)2005P 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 78
- The diagram shows the production of hydroelectricity 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 59, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... to 2005. Although cameras are in place its their sole responsibilities to make sur...
^^^
Line 4, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o 3% and death rates are fluctuating and stays at 0.8%. For year 2003, The camera...
^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to 3.7% and 1%. This is the first time the death rates reaches this point. The ...
^^^
Line 8, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut the accidents steadily increasing and reaches 3.5% which is a largest value. A...
^^^
Line 9, column 23, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... increasing and reaches 3.5% which is a largest value. And lastly the death rat...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89333333333 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50563414511 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524444444444 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5523127539 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.090909091 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 3.83414634146 235% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0775481771156 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352169088666 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316106364478 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0424683732139 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332390941691 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.