The chart shows the amount of fast foods consumption in Melbourne over period of time.
The table compares the fast food prices in Melbourne over the wide region of time.
Firstly the hamburgers price is decreased in present on comparing to before thus a good sign for hamburgers eaters, however by the year 2025
the amount may rise to 51.
Secondly the other food items like fried chicken, salads, fried rice, noodles rate steadily increasing throughout the years. In future we can
notice a significant increase in
Lastly the price of food items keeps on increasing as the year progresses. Only for the last two items the price is steadily rising and for rest
the price is heavily went up.
In the coming years price of foods increasing at a rapid state. Nowadays people tend to eat food outside and not self cooking because of late office works. People should keep up proper
work life balance to make sure the good health and prosperity.
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories. (Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home, housework and gardening.) 78
- The diagram shows the production of hydroelectricity 81
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne (units)2005P 73
- The diagram shows the production of hydroelectricity 56
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...we can notice a significant increase in Lastly the price of food items keeps on ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 724.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85906040268 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33647671996 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.664429530201 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7792036122 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 3.83414634146 235% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137654182444 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700971058158 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102542130852 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0617469337912 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101487785402 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.