Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old
houses in the local areas, while others think that people should have freedom to
build houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion?
It is argued that the style of traditional houses should be adopted on new houses in the local areas; however, others believe that it is free for everyone to select their own style of the house. I agree with the view that new houses should be constructed with the same traditional structure as others in the area.
On the one hand, there are some benefits for citizens when building a new house with their own style. First of all, individuals will have a structure as they want in their home. By designing their own style, they can arrange the furniture and decorate each room to make them satisfied and happy when coming home. Moreover, in term of economic of scale, people can reduce the high cost of materials they need to pay when following modern construction. For example, tradition construction material like wood is nowadays replaced by aluminum or plastic with lower price.
On the other hand, there are arguments that a new house should follow the existing constructions in the area. Firstly, the traditional houses have the intangible cultural heritage of a town or village which is needed to be spread. By building the houses that keep a similar style, it helps people to aware of their roots. Secondly, the new houses which are built by real estate developers might be incompatible with the historical buildings. As a result, the mixing of modern architectural styles will create an eyesore for everyone.
In conclusion, although the traditional houses might be costly, it should be respected by modern housing developments
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | petertrung | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | Nguyen Trong Trung | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | Nguyen Trong Trung | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | Nguyen Trong Trung | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | Tri H. Ho | 78 | view |
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups inone town who rode bicycles in 2011 78
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the oldhouses in the local areas, while others think that people should have freedom tobuild houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion? 73
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the oldhouses in the local areas, while others think that people should have freedom tobuild houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion? 56
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 73
- Some people think that in the countries with high rate of unemployment, there is no need for the government to offer secondary education to primary school pupils who have no hope of finding a job in the future 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95366795367 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69595406745 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544401544402 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9036804851 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.6923076923 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292670444518 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110796057634 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07553681488 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190034500479 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560609115899 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.