The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006
The bar charts compares the different the energy consumption between UK and USA for 2000 to 20.6. Overall, at the beginning the period, oil part of USA was the highest energy consumption while other renewable sources of USA was the least segment in 2006.
Regarding to the data that UK oil earned the most energy consumption each year between 2000 and 2006 with contributed 35% and 40%. In contrast USA oil just only with 38% and 30%. Other of energy consumption of UK donated too, there are coal, gas, nuclear power, and other renewable sources which different calculated of years. At the first time, coal section accounted for 35% whilst had a slight descreased of 10% to next year. The third segment was gas whilst had increased dramatically about 13% from 12% to 25%. And there are nuclear power and other renewable sources fragment included for 8% and 5% which both was experience a fell to 5% and 3% at the end of term.
On the other country, coal had a plunged to 13% which the third most negative on this decade and followed by gas was figure of 38% which was the positive in 2006. Meanwhile, nuclear power and other renewable sources get 15% and 8% which had dropped gradually and go up from the first period to 8% and 10%.
- the graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 61
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 56
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 73
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies. Discuss the advantage and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 73
- he bar charts shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'compare'.
Suggestion: compare
The bar charts compares the different the energy consumption be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...d 2006 with contributed 35% and 40%. In contrast USA oil just only with 38% and 30%. Oth...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58108108108 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39843187279 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504504504505 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4952144235 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237991766518 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998228511168 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136181871775 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199909345352 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158197417771 0.0819641961636 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.