With a fast pace of modern life more and more people are turning towards fast food for their main meals. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
The past decade has experienced a dramatic increase in the availability of fast food due to the fast pace of life. Whilst there remains some disagreement as to whether this is a positive or a negative trend, I intend to argue that this is a worrying tendency and fast food is detrimental to individuals and families at large. There are two primary reasons for this.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that fast food brings about major health problems for people. The food such as hamburgers, chips, or fried chicken which are incredibly high in fat and salt are responsible for a multitude of ailments, for instance, high blood pressure, obesity and heart diseases. Moreover, the cost and inconvenience of treating illnesses for those people who consume a large amount of fast food are significant in later life. Put differently, fast food is beneficial in the short term but the long-term influences are somewhat negative.
Further and even more importantly, though, eating fast food to excess has adverse effects at the family level. Promotion campaigns of fast food chains deliberately attempt to attract young children and shape unhealthy eating habits of them. Having grown up eating fast food, they are inclined to consume a large amount of fast food throughout their adult lives. As a result, both juveniles and adults are less likely to spend quality time with their beloved ones and avoid bonding with other family members. They are prone to swallow their fast food quickly to catch up on their work or eagerly devour their food in front of a computer terminal in lieu of sitting around the table to stark a conversation while eating. This phenomenon would demolish the bonding between youngsters and older generations, thereby widening the generation gaps.
By way of conclusion, I again reaffirm my position that fast food is more likely to result in negative impacts on both individuals and families. Given these risks, I believe that public education campaigns encouraging people to consume fast food in moderation would be warranted.
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 61
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people argue that immigrants should adopt the local culture when immigrating to a new country. An alternative view is that they can adapt to new environment by establishing a minority community. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Some people argue that immigrants should adopt the local culture when immigrating to a new country. An alternative view is that they can adapt to new environment by establishing a minority community. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Some people argue that immigrants should adopt the local culture when immigrating to a new country. An alternative view is that they can adapt to new environment by establishing a minority community. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
... Whilst there remains some disagreement as to whether this is a positive or a negative trend,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, while, as to, for instance, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05294117647 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73193341932 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591176470588 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5571655031 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.533333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328009084149 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111081090397 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578668406942 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195293434884 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211376029099 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.