The following bar chart illustrates the mobile phone ownership in ten European countries throughout the year from 2005 to 2010.
The bar chart illustrates the change in the number of people having cellphone in ten European nations between 2005 and 2010.
Overall, the amount of mobile phone owner increased sharply in each country over the period. However, this figure varied significantly across the various nations.
In 2005, the UK, Germany, and Italy had the highest number of people possessing cellphone, at around 4 million. In contrast, the Netherlands, Spain, Norway, Denmark, France, and Finland had the lowest mobile phone owner amount, varying to just a million.
However, the year 2010 had witnessed a dramatic increase in the number of cell phone possessor. This figures remained highest in Germany, UK, and Italy, at 14, 12 and above 10 million respectively, while in Finland, Norway, Denmark, and the Netherlands, the figures grew up to approximately 2 million, reaching the same level as Sweden in 2005. There were also considerably increase in the number of people owning mobile phone in Sweden, France, and Spain respectively by about 7, 6 and 5 million.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-22 | Nguyễn Hương Giang | 92 | view |
| 2019-02-26 | phoenix0811 | 89 | view |
| 2018-12-26 | Nguyen My | 56 | view |
- The chart shows the number of days the average employee has off work per year in 4 different countries 34
- In many cities today, most people live in large apartment block. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages than disadvantages? 67
- The following bar chart illustrates the mobile phone ownership in ten European countries throughout the year from 2005 to 2010 92
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects.What are the causes? And what will be effected on society? 84
- "Some countries encourage students to have part-time jobs and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views." 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19526627219 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77209935883 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6392232223 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215199818642 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989921432627 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953148473967 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149565170602 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997870572428 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.