In many nations, people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units, instead of a large, extended family. Is this a positive or negative trend?
It is observed that in several countries, residents of metropolitan areas tend to live as singletons or with their nuclear families instead of living in multigenerational households. Personally, I believe this is a positive trend, which will be proven in the following essay.
Forefront among the benefits of the aforementioned trend is freedom of choice. Large families often have conflicts of lifestyles, because different generations want and value different things. For instance, while young members of a family would prioritize work over family time, the elderly often expect their children or grandchildren to put aside work to come home early. Regular quarrels over differences such as this can lead to higher levels of dissatisfaction among family members and strained relationships. In answer to this problem, living alone or with small family units enables people to have the liberty to pursue their goals, without having to deal with constant judgement or criticism.
Furthermore, the modern trend is also financial sensible, as housing and living expenses in densely populated cities are quite costly. To give an illustration, the old quarter in Hanoi, the capital of Vietnam, sees families of 10 cramping in tiny rundown apartments. These large families frequently experience issues such as the lack of clean water and expensive electricity bills. Living alone or with fewer family members would help to reduce pressure on infrastructure, allowing for a higher standard of living.
A popular argument against the trend observed points out the negative impacts on people’s mental health and family ties. However, these problems could be dealt accordingly by scheduling enough time for social activities and family reunions.
Considering the arguments above, I believe that the trend to live alone or in small families has notable merits, outweighing its drawbacks and making it a beneficial development overall.
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals.Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion. 84
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university 72
- The importance of biodiversity is being more widely recognized as increasing numbers of species come under threat What can be done to maintain biodiversity 92
- Men and women are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples.Write at least 250 words 84
- Meat production requires relatively more land than crop production Some people think that as land is becoming scarce the world s meat consumption should be reduced What measures could be taken to reduce the world s meat consumption What kinds of problem m 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'cramping' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cramps'.
Suggestion: cramps
...capital of Vietnam, sees families of 10 cramping in tiny rundown apartments. These large...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, furthermore, however, if, so, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56418918919 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.021318746 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631756756757 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5234459531 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.642857143 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263303923746 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831905735071 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466915757889 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144100744044 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212162214041 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.