Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
Currently, it is believe that in this essay, I am not agreement on the increasing price of petrol. In view of these ways are not the best solution to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
On the one hand, the major disadvantage of this plan only influence the other sector, which increasing price of petrol just the bad effect to folk economics. Its because, influencing on the other cost like public transportation. For example, some developed countries, the economics transportation sharp expensive of influencing of petrol of costly. Moreover, this way like way of amateur to decrease traffic and pollution problems. Its due to, that method is not researched by scientific. As an example, many developing countries unsuccessful negotiate this traffic and pollution problems because of does not in-depth research. As the result, this statement with to increase price of petrol is not realistic, because it will add the big problem notably on those sectors. It is no doubt that, the essential problems like traffic flow and pollution problems that is on the transport more and more increasing, it is not reasoned by gas.
On the other hand, there is also benefit on this statement that is improving of country income. This plan has positive effect on the most people, notably to realize country's programs, but it need measure between advantage and disadvantage. Its due to, every statement which connecting to everyone have to is researched by detail. In several case, many people to reject of increasing oil price, because has negative influence on the some area. Therefore, this statement is not side to people's low, just take sides on people's wealthy. It is important that, increasing of gas price is not give more advantage.
In conclusion, there are many challenges to apply this statement the society. Perhaps we needed more awareness of current problems because so much disadvantage without available solution. I do not believe, if petrol cost of increasing is able to of finishing the main problems.
- The average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 67
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 56
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 73
- The chart below show the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 73
- The average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
Currently, it is believe that in this essay, I am not agreement ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
... just the bad effect to folk economics. Its because, influencing on the other cost ...
^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun case seems to be countable; consider using: 'several cases'.
Suggestion: several cases
...one have to is researched by detail. In several case, many people to reject of increasing oi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
..., because has negative influence on the some area. Therefore, this statement is not ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16109422492 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88792190697 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519756838906 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9797715735 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3684210526 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3157894737 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272245433866 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864320537046 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830272421727 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19125262386 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974134688743 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.