the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000
The transformation in yearly spending by Someland’s local government in 1980, 1990, and 2000 is provided in the pie charts. It can be seen that the higher education expenditure was the highest over the following years, and an increase was seen in environmental services sector, while the K-12 education and other expenses were in contrary.
Starting at 35%, the money spent for higher education showed a fluctuation in 20 years, remained a rise of 5% at the end of period. While the health and human resources spent more money 1990, the expense of transportation decreased on in ten at the same period. However, this contrasted to the next decade the transporting expenditure climbed to 22%, and the health and human resource sector showed a drop of a half.
Though became the least expense recorded in 1980, the environmental services area rose slightly, but still below than 10% in 2000. The K-12 Education spent a quarter of local state’s budget at the beginning, and it fell steadily until remaining 18% 20 years later. A very small percentage was found in other expenditure though still decreased throughout the year
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 61
- the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000 78
- Improvement in health, education, and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas.To what extent do you agree or disagre 61
- the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000 78
- the number of viewers who enjoy sporting programs in particular countries (Australia, The UK, The USA, and Canada). 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en that the higher education expenditure was the highest over the following years...
^^
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'services'' or 'service's'?
Suggestion: services'; service's
...d an increase was seen in environmental services sector, while the K-12 education and ot...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ugh became the least expense recorded in 1980, the environmental services area ro...
^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'services'' or 'service's'?
Suggestion: services'; service's
...se recorded in 1980, the environmental services area rose slightly, but still below tha...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08556149733 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9593120985 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1130814467 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.875 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152456948781 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752513111754 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110015122551 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101730391689 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508941023399 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.