Nowadays, people of all ages from certain parts of the world spend most time at home rather than going outdoors. Discuss the reasons, is this negative or positive development?
Today, there is a tendency that in particular parts of the world, numerous people belonging to all age groups are less likely to spend time outdoors and rather prefer staying at home. Regarding this trend, there are several causes and effects which will be discussed in this essay.
To begin with, because technological development has been continuously advancing from the last century, several trends have been triggered to grow by it. One of noticeable ones is that people are interested in being involved with their activities which depend on the age at home. For example, there are such people who prefer telecommunication to make their living rather than working in office jobs. This is because modern gadgets are full of functions that let them do this. In addition, by this way, they do not have to allot their income to additional expenses such as public transport to commute. Secondly, in some countries, some products are not available to come by pervasively in shopping centers and this leads costumers to use online shoppings at home. However, even in opposite case this happens, because they are reluctant to do shopping outdoor.
Turning to the effects, what the tendency will mainly result in is numerous antisocial people. Firstly, it is not considered beneficial for children, because avoiding spending time with others will not let their soft skills develop. Hence, they will not understand the importance of collaborative activities which may give a rise to problems related to the job in the future. On the other hand, spending more time at home may be considered as an positive development, since some individuals do not use their cars. As a result, traffic congestion may decrease so that the rate of exhaust gas emitted by automobiles does not be disappointing level. Furthermore, noise pollution may no longer very annoying for citizens.
In summary, technology has a noticeable role in people choosing indoor activities with several additional factors. In fact, people do not want to spend extra money and also prefer online shopping. Consequently, this will cause bad habits such as not being interested in social activities. However, environment may get benefit with low level pollution.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-25 | Toghrul Azizli | 87 | view |
- The most common solution for criminal behaviour is prison but many believe education is a better method To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In some countries young people are not only richer but also safer and healthier than ever before However they are less happy What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 89
- Some people think that to be successful you need to get in university education whereas others say it is not true Discuss both ideas and give your own opinion 61
- The most common solution for criminal behaviour is prison but many believe education is a better method To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Nowadays people of all ages from certain parts of the world spend most time at home rather than going outdoors Discuss the reasons is this negative or positive development 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her than working in office jobs. This is because modern gadgets are full of funct...
^^
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... more time at home may be considered as an positive development, since some indivi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, for example, in addition, in fact, in particular, in summary, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19498607242 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81986068447 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576601671309 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1384642823 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1578947368 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8947368421 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5263157895 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231031122343 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628037562668 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683693253664 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152198235981 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933845945278 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.