The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table illustrates the proportion of spending by purchaser in three categories, including Food/Drinks/Tobacco, Clothing/Footwear and Leisure/Education in five specific countries in 2002.
In general, consumer spent a huge amount of money in Food/Drinks/Tobacco whereas Leisure/Education has the least expenditure, and Turkey has the highest rate of spending in the two categories, which were 32.14% and 4.35% respectively.
Particularly, in the areas of food, drinks and tobacco, ireland was recorded to be the second country with the highest percentage of expenditure, at 28.91% when spain, italy and sweden consumers’ spending were under 20%. On the contrary, there was around 3.20% of italy and sweden purchasers’ expense was on leisure or education. That proportion of ireland and spain was also low, at 2.21% and nearly 2% respectively. Clothing and footwear have the medium percentage of spending with 9% of expenditure of the Italian, around 6.50% of ireland, spain and Turkey’s buyer, and 5.40% of the Swedish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Noah1997 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | shayma | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | phungnguyen1611 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 84
- The chart below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems What are those problems In order to reduce the problems should we discourage people to use cars 61
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems What are the problems What are the solutions 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, whereas, in general, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72903225806 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.8284764659 2.65546596893 144% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606451612903 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3560790835 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.0 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116878309002 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592884637951 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628510316601 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979225116917 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603985937667 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.2329268293 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.4140731707 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.