the urban transport system receives more funds compared to the rural transport system.
why do you think is so?
how can it be solved?
Ignoring villagers’ requirements, a vast amount of expenditure on transportation is allocated to urban areas. In the following assay, I intend to explore the primary source of the problem as well as a practical solution to it.
From my perspective, chief among all the causes is advertising. Broadcasting the latest news, the impact of media is such that to bring a paradigm shift to society. Due to this fact, donors have mostly been inclined to contribute to the implementation of activities through which the public attention would be drawn to their projects. For instance, not even a single person would be unaware about the latest alterations to New York City subway. Nonetheless, seldom could a new road construction in a distant countryside break the news.
In order to stem the rising tide of this carelessness, an effective solution is warranted. A salient one would undoubtedly be enacting new legislation which culminate in a more balanced distribution. It is an indisputable fact that had the urban transport budget restricted to a reasonable amount, rural areas would have faced more opportunities to enhance local transportation system. Let us neither forget that NGOs also have a major role to play as a further method by pledging both financial and emotional support for rural transport projects.
By way of conclusion, in the terms of transportation, the media has tempted donors to participate in urban projects. Although the problem is highly unlikely to be resolved in the foreseeable future, new laws and NGOs can stave off the gravity of this predicament.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-30 | fereshtehlot | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 84
- These days it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace.Are there more advantages or dis advantages to this situation?Give your own opinion and include relevant examples. 61
- Everybody should expect to have more than one career these days To what extend do you agree or disagree 59
- people nowadays sleep less than they used to in the past what do you think is the reason behind this what are the effects in individuals and people around them 53
- the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nonetheless, so, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.234375 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25146451378 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62890625 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.696873593 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.076923077 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1723578906 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486832962431 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664487690504 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916572675633 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669801596227 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.