The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010
The table gives information about how much money are spent on supporting technology for developing countries by us, EU and other charities between 2006 and 2010. Overall, the amount of money in aid of technology increased steadily in all nations during the period and the us aid were much higher than the remaining donor countries.
There was a dramatic rise on the total aid, going up from 15.7 billion of USD to 30 billion of USD over the period 5 years. Among these, the US was the charities which given big money for developing counties, with a rise in air each year from $9,7 billion in 2006 and reach a peak at $22.7 billion in the last year.
Regarding EU and other countries, the amount of money was much lower than that of the US. In EU countries, the charities provided $3.3 billion in the first year and reached the highest point of $4.0 billions in 2010, after a slightly declined of about $0.3 billion in 2009. Likewise, in the same year, there was a similar decrease in the aid given in other countries, following with an increase from $15.7 billion in 20016 to $3.3 billion in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | wardiati | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | khoavodoj | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | koinoyokan | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | oxfordpro111 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | JennieD | 67 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. 56
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007( you can search google for seeing the picture) 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 73
- The diagram below show how orange juice is produced 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er than the remaining donor countries. There was a dramatic rise on the total a...
^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nties, with a rise in air each year from ,7 billion in 2006 and reach a peak at 2....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, likewise, regarding
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52525252525 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42188437505 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540404040404 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.5112225522 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37838372548 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184857361012 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123350666159 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266566332571 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128287005515 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.