Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old
houses in the local areas, while others think that people should have freedom to
build houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, concerns about the style of new constructions has been a topic of debate in many parts of the world, while some people argue that everyone should be free to
choose their own style of house, I still hold the view that new houses should be constructed in the same architectural style with the existing ones.
On the one hand, there are some who argue that it is essential to welcome change and
every individual should be entitled to have the right to live in a modern style of house, if they so wish, irrespective of the locality. Because it is obvious a basic right of human, not a privilege, to quench their thirst for new trend of accommodation around the world. Especially, such house is where they probably attach to in their entire life, which means that they are more likely to construct it as much modern as they can to enjoy a higher living conditions. This, it might hard to achieve by obeying old style.
On the other hand, there are strong arguments that new houses should abide by the existing architectural style of a local area. In terms of the tangible cultural heritage of a small town or village, traditional houses which have historical significance not only give a strong sense of identity to the locality but also provide a link to our roots, while a modern counterpart is certain to be incompatible with historical connections. From an architectural perspective, modern houses alongside traditional dwellings are an eyesore which means that they might fail to blend in with the housing which has grown organically, perhaps during centuries.
To recapitulate, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that it is
better to keep new houses in accordance with the original ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | petertrung | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | Nguyen Trong Trung | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | Nguyen Trong Trung | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | Nguyen Trong Trung | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | Tri H. Ho | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85858585859 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78490464171 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558922558923 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.1809681553 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.333333333 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249863653905 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977431149891 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684266051137 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114131433005 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579113163652 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 9.78957915832 281% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.