BOTH THE RICH AND THE POOR FIND THE ACCESSIBILITY INTO UNIVERSITY DIFFICULT AGREE OR DISAGREE
While some people believe it is hard for both the affluent and the indigent to get into the tertiary institution of learning, a lot more think it is not. In my opinion, I believe a number of reasons have created this difficulty in accessing this level of education irrespective of social class. This essay x-rays the challenges of acquiring admissions into our citadels of learning for the larger population of post-high school pupils even though they are suitably qualified to be so admitted.
The infrastructural deficit is a big issue in developing countries like Nigeria and lack of these amenities affect both the rich and the poor. The number of Universities to pupil ratio is so low that irrespective of your social class or standing, you cannot just walk or wish yourself into one. The admissions board in Nigeria, for instance, said that it only admitted about 20% of students that sat for its matriculation exams notwithstanding if they had scored above the national cut off. They also admitted that intakes will increase if the number of universities in the country increases. Therefore we can see that lack of infrastructure makes it difficult for both the wealthy who can afford it and the poor who may likely hope for scholarships.
Also, there is the issue of formulating the proper policies in education. The United Nations stipulates that a minimum of 26% of your annual National budget must be spent on education, nevertheless, it is rarely so for a lot of developing countries. The result then is that there is a continuous decline in educational quality and indeed the number of new universities that can be opened. This situation affects all citizenry regardless of your wealth class or status. This poorly implemented policy makes it difficult for all comers to have access to university education.
Accessing university education is like finding a needle in a haystack; even with the introduction of private universities. There should be a proactive plan in increasing the number of universities, in order to increase the ease of entry
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | iykepharm2000@yahoo.com | 78 | view |
- in the future, it may be scientifically possible for people to live for 150 years. this could be good news for an individual but it may have a negative consequence for our world as a wholewhat are the benefits and risks of people living up to 150 years 84
- Some people say that the Internet is bringing people together by making the world smaller.Do you agree that the Internet is making it easier for people to communicate with one another? 78
- in the future, it may be scientifically possible for people to live for 150 years. this could be good news for individuals but it may have a negative consequence for our world as a wholewhat are the benefits and risks of people living 150 years 67
- In the future, it may be scientifically possible for people to live for 150 years. this could be good news for an individual but it may have a negative consequence for our world as a wholewhat are the benefits and risks of people living up to 150 years 84
- you would like to buy some electrical goods from a shop in a town far away from where you live. write a letter to the manager 1; say which electrical goods you want2. ask questions on cost and how to pay4. explain how you will collect the goodsno need for 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ot just walk or wish yourself into one. The admissions board in Nigeria, for instan...
^^^
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... universities in the country increases. Therefore we can see that lack of infrastructure ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05847953216 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03100605554 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5594796948 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201980377913 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063571929578 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064672628035 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110932734351 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275606333326 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.