The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
The chart shows the level of donations among British people according to age between 1990 and 2010.
Overall, the percentages of people making charitable donations before and after the age of 50 share different patterns. There was a decrease in the figure for people aged 18-50, while that of people aged over 50 witnessed an opposite trend.
In 1990 the proportion of the British in the age group of 36-50 donating money was the highest, at 42%, while the 18-25s contributed the least, at only 17%. However, by 2010, these figures had declined significantly to 35% and 5% respectively. The percentages of people contributing money in the 26-35 age group experienced a considerable decrease between 1990 and 2010, from 31% to 24%.
While donations up to the age of 50 declined across the two years, they rose among the 51-65 age-group from 35% to nearly 40%, which was the highest figure in 2010. The figure for people who were over 65s in 2010 was lower than this, but it was still a little higher than the 1990 figure, at 32%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | exdiscipulus | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | manaswi.ielts | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | azizkhon | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Zuna-ira | 67 | view |
- Earlier technological development brought more changes to the life of ordinary people than recent technological development does. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 84
- In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think sports are important to society. Others say that it is nothing more than a leisure activity. Discuss both views and give opinion. 84
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76666666667 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55364663004 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.1483100824 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.25 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257931551542 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131983023683 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668926433567 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186386631467 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508912174763 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.