Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Nowadays, with the progress of technology, the number of cars and transportation facilities have increased dramatically. There is a heated controversy between governments and people who care about the environment about the reduction in the production of vehicles. These people think that this increase in the number of cars is dangerous for the environment. I believe that they should not concern about this for there will be fewer cars in the future. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will elaborate in the following essay.
First of all, the number of people is decreasing in recent years in most of the developed countries. As a matter of fact, the population of most European countries has diminished in the last decade that most of these countries like Germany and England have problems because of this phenomena. With considering this in mind, it is rational to think that the number of cars will decrease in the next years, too. As far as I am concerned, the fewer people in the world, the fewer cars they need to move. For instance, in the recent years, the population of my country has reduced, and based on researches, this reduction will continue in the future, so the number of people who use automobiles to transfer decreases.
Secondly, most of the people in developing countries prefer to use public transportation facilities, like bus and taxi since using these facilities are more cost-effective for them. It is worth mentioning that the price of oil and other fossil fuels have increased exceedingly in recent years. Therefore, most of the individuals prefer to do not use their own cars to transport since they can save more money. If the price of oil increase in the future, the number of people who prefer to use other means of transportation increase, so there will be fewer cars in the streets in the next two decades. My life is a compelling example of this. Three years ago, all of the members of my family had their own cars. There was not any problem with the money that we had to spend on oil because the price of oil was meager at that time. In recent years the price of oil has changed a lot, so my father decided to sell two cars because he could not afford the price of oil anymore.
By way of conclusion, I strongly believe that the number of cars will reduce drastically in the next twenty years. This is because not only will the population of the Earth diminish gradually in the future but also use other means of transportation will be more advantageous in the future.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-12 thonsapon83 90 view
2020-01-03 nusybah 70 view
2019-12-18 TEJAS PATIL 70 view
2019-11-19 Luis Cortes 60 view
2019-10-12 fofty 70 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing
Essays by user Amirhossein76 :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ny and England have problems because of this phenomena. With considering this in min...
^^^^
Line 3, column 659, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...lling example of this. Three years ago, all of the members of my family had their own cars...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, i feel, as a matter of fact, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69074492099 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72967131416 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426636568849 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1156151493 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.9 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.15 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192698666848 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652775872414 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445309893578 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129684959257 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240266643965 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.