Mothers generally stay home to take care of their children after pregnancy. Do you support the opinion that these mothers should be compensated by the government?
There is a controversial issue about еру payments to unemployed mothers with infants. Some social workers state that authorities should support them financially, while some politicians think that they should be deprived of any state payment. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and agree with the idea of financial backing.
Let us start with reasons why some politicians argue that after pregnancy mothers should receive governmental money. The first reason is that they need money to contribute to family income. Women rarely have the opportunity to work part-time, while they are doing child rearing, so they earn no money for household needs, but with the monetary help from the state they could afford more. Another reason is that many single mothers with infants hardly make ends meet. Many women support their little children alone, which aggravates their and children's existence, so authorities should alleviate their financial burden by providing some money. Therefore, it is reasonable for officials to support mothers with money as a compensation for maternity after pregnancy.
However, some politicians say that the government should not reimburse women at home for motherhood. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, authorities are incapable to assist all mothers. The budget of the country cannot allocate huge fundings for millions of women in maternity, because it is responsible for other essential programs, such as supporting orphans and building social facilities. Secondly, it may create problems to the economy. If officials compensated each woman for being unable to work due to child caring, the budget would suffer from deficiency, which would negatively affect other social programs. As a result, it is irrational to bring changes to the budget in favor of unemployed mothers.
In conclusion, even though some politicians advocate that authorities should abandon any attempt to compensate jobless mothers for motherhood, I think that they should help them, because they usually fail to lead a normal life with no monetary support from the government.
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world What are the reasons for this and suggest some solutions 67
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff all times,especially holidays.Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 78
- Some people feel that paparazzi should not follow celebrities and invade their privacy by taking pictures of them everywhere while others believe this is just the price of fame Discuss both sides and give your opinion 92
- Can brain damage from drugs be reversed? 84
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn.Discuss both views and give your opinion 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 515, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...men support their little children alone, which aggravates their and childrens exi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48024316109 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74067067782 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580547112462 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2089280414 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.058823529 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215129748271 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667962396295 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613511651257 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126989120241 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396016783667 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.