The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030
The line graph illustrates the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 predictions until 2030. Overall, except for hydropower, all kinds of energy provided in the graph show a similar upward trend during the period.
To begin with, Petrol and Oil occupied the biggest quadrillion units at roughly 40p.the consumption of petrol and oil stared at 35q in 1980 the fluctuated during the twenty-year- period and forecasted to rise steadily from around 37q in 200 0 to just under 50q in 2030. It is also interesting to note that a similar trend in coal and natural gas. In 1980, natural gas and coal stared at 20q and 15q respectively, then equaled in 1990 and 2015, and a steady increase is predicted in these two kinds of energy to around 25q in 2030.
A similar pattern is also noted on the consumption of nuclear and solar or wind in the USA, both stared at a low point around 5q then a slight increase is planned to reach approximately 7q in 2030. Hydropower made up the lowest usage under 5q the leveled off from 4q to 2q between 1980 and 2010 and remaining constant at approximately 2q.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-21 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | neverlandforestcat | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-10 | brew | 78 | view |
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 84
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 56
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 84
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree with these views? 73
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, then, except for, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58163265306 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68619420686 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.5089175549 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.285714286 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226074574615 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116621016986 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128532173975 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167964012856 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879882980325 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.