Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and cultures. Others think it's not necessary. Discuss both views.
In recent decades, the question whether a nation should welcome the cultural diversity from their visitors or not has been receiving a great deal of public attention from the community. Although this trend is not without advantages, its disadvantages still overshadow.
There are many positive aspects when visitors follow local customs and cultures. First, by abiding by the regional customs, they can broaden their horizons. For example, tours on Tet holidays are the best occasion for travellers to explore traditional festivals and special cuisines in the host nations, thereby widening their cultural knowledge of different countries. Second, since each nation has their own national identity, local people can feel really irritated when other foreign people behave in different manners. It means the adoption of various cultures is prone to unexpected modification in inherently initial beauty of their culture, which can be detrimental to nation’s cultural preservation.
On the other hand, there are a whole host of reasons why a nation should be open-minded to cultural differences from other countries. First, if people absorb the goodness of various cultures, they can reinforce their local cultures. For example, throughout the tourist activities and music festivals to welcome travellers, people can learn other nation’s customs, thus looking back their strength and developing it. Second, by applying encouraging policies to visitors, the number of tours can increase. For instance, Singapore is considered as the most attractive destination in ASEAN because it is a melting pot with a wide range of cultures and open policies from government for tourism, thereby visitors feel comfortable and would like to come back this nation many times, flourishing national economy.
In conclusion, it is obvious that the demerits of cultural differences surpass its benefits. By considering its pros and cons, the government and local residents can have the best choice for economy and society development.
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. 84
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 73
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four differentseasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the mainfeatures and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and cultures. Others think it's not necessary. Discuss both views. 84
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four differentseasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the mainfeatures and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
In recent decades, the question whether a nation should welcome the cultural di...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
... On the other hand, there are a whole host of reasons why a nation should be open-...
^^^^
Line 5, column 813, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny times, flourishing national economy. In conclusion, it is obvious that the de...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, really, second, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64052287582 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9035428179 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578431372549 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4055621071 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.285714286 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148335625865 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598941419009 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737625087513 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830085967136 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513920788709 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.