Governments should provide the poor and the homeless with houses.
Government in each country has a lot of responsibilities respect to the society. It should provide a balance in a society between poor, moderate and rich people in all aspects including education, medical benefits, hobbies and also the house. I think that the government should provide house for people who are not able and not have enough money to buy or rent and I explain the reasons on the following paragraphs.
First, poor and homeless people are part of society and they have the right to have the minimum level in their lives. One of the most important requirement for a family life is house. Unfortunately, the price of houses is increasing rapidly mostly in countries have a high inflation. On account of this situation, the government should play a helping role for part of the society which are more vulnerable. For example, some years ago, my country experienced an inflation of 40 percent and it influences the quality life of poor people. Some of them could not rent house anymore and they became homeless. On that condition, the government started a big project to build about 10000 houses in about 23 cities to compensate the effects of high inflation rate on the quality life of poor people. This project has been executed and the poor people found out that have been seen by other part of society and also the government and therefore they have been very happy of their life.
Another reason that I think encourages a government to provide houses for poor and homeless people is regarding to security of the whole society. Unfortunately, most criminals are coming from the lowest part of society who could not provide the minimum requirement for the life of themselves and also their families. When the poor and homeless people could not find any right way to meet their needs, they were forced to join criminal groups. Development of criminal groups would be very dangerous for society security and would force the local and federal government to allocate more budget and funds to solve this problem. As it is obvious, the most expensive part of any poor people lives is regarding houses. Although building house for poor and homeless people would be very costly for the government but there are very advantages in regards to security which will compensate that funding.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that the government should provide houses for poor and homeless people because of the above mentioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-22 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | tedyang777 | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 836, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...overnment but there are very advantages in regards to security which will compensate that fun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92233009709 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61721174953 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45145631068 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4967610349 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306058103398 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107793295007 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810460202805 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237564758321 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648235035646 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.