Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of rights of doctors and teachers and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate, although contested by many that social contribution is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that more payment can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, social equality can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that job satisfaction, as well as welfare services are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered effects of celebrities. Thus, beneficial ramification of both entertainment personalities and medical and education organizations apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of economy, rising prosperity might increase the consequences of more salary, and fundamental aspects of rate of employment relate to this reality that demerit of unemployment pertatin to desired future. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by prestigous universities, has asserted that the downside of social disorders are correlated negatively with athletics and actors. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of great contribution.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefit of more income for teachers and doctors far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do tha advantages of general health and education prove the significance of fostering, but also pinpoint the implications of future generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | alireza_esml@yahoo.com | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | alireza_esml@yahoo.com | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
- "More information available online so library's book are useless" or As e-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree. 85
- what role should governments play to combat climate change? 88
- Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
- ANY RECENT INVENTION THAT YOU THINK PROVED BENEFICIAL OR DETRIMENTAL TO SOCIETY. 80
- Foreign languages should be compulsory in the primary school. How far do you agree with the above statement? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72222222222 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31534260652 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674603174603 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.2439026398 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.2 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.081702736136 0.242375264174 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0278638021107 0.0925447433944 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0225116866188 0.071462118173 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0446876328876 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196053385934 0.0609392437508 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.27 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.