Some people think the cheap air flight gives ordinary people more freedom. However, others think the cheap air flight should be banned because it pollutes the air and brings many other problems.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, charter-flight has brought significant changes to our lives. However, whether the cheap aircraft should be prohibited due to its negative impact is a controversial issue. I am of the opinion that banning low-cost airline would do more harm than good.
There are significant drawbacks associated with preventing low-price aircrafts. First of all, it is clear that this action would lead to many people will be unemployed. This means that cheap aircraft provide jobs for thousands of citizens and without them mass unemployment would be alternative. Moreover, most of these flights are to tourism destinations, so the economics of tourist hotspots would be severely damaged. For example, the income of restaurants and equipment hire business in this location would be greatly reduced and causing the destruction of the entire economy. Therefore, the local authorities should give a priority to improve quality of charter-flight rather than prohibiting it.
This is not to say that curbing low-cost airlines would not bring advantage to society. There are, of course, with the resulting reduction in flight, less airports would need to be constructed. This may be a good outcome because airports are costly for government seeing that expensive infrastructure such as roads and rail lines are required to reach them. In addition, Aircraft run on fossil fuels that discharge pollutants into the environment, so if a government do not enact law to ban cheap air flights, it would increase the greenhouse effect and lead to environmental contamination. But still, the cons are far greater.
In conclusion, making an effort to prohibit charter-flight will have an influence on the economic development of the country. Meanwhile, local authorities must shoulder their responsibilities to protect the environment. Only by doing so we can assure that we could hand this beautiful planet to our next generation and the next generation after.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-14 | trungtrung | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-02 | drtruong92 | 84 | view |
- he two pie charts below show the pollution entering a particular part of ocean in 1997 and 2007 69
- Many people say that companies, factory owners and privates tour operates should pay the bills for cleaning up pollution, instead of government. To what extend do you agree or disagree. 78
- the graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030 67
- Some people have benefited from modern communications technology, but some other people have not benefited from; to what extend do you agree or disagree. 78
- Some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion.Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun airports is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...with the resulting reduction in flight, less airports would need to be constructed. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, of course, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43894389439 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1383206007 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640264026403 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.891752379 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9411764706 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173156167268 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485114963094 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379250997237 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999439140854 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467852786694 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.