Some people think that environmental problem should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
When it comes to environmental issues, there is an important debate regarding its implementation. While some believe that it should be dealt on a global platform, others support that these problems can be better handled nationally. In my opinion, global participation is very crucial to deal with environmental problems
as it gives way to better planning and also provides scope for funding the poorer nations to accomplish the mission as a whole.
On the one hand, the environmental problems when handled by the government of a particular nation understands the root cause of the problem at a micro-level. This understanding gives a clear vision for the application of various strategies. To illustrate,
the national decisions are directed by the local governing bodies, who aptly report out the minute details causing the problems. And hence a more effective resolution can be implemented by the nation.
On the other hand, a collaboration between various nations not only allows for the exchange of various ideas between nations and better planning for resolving the problem, but it also creates a ground for better understanding of each other's problem and hence finds better solutions to tackle them. For example, an underdeveloped country may not have enough resources to eradicate its environmental concerns, so other developed nations may fund them to tackle these issues if they are taken up at a global level. So, as the merits of handling environmental concerns
globally has more impact than handling the issue nationally I personally support global platform.
In conclusion, environmental issues need national intervention for implementation of various strategies but it can be better dealt with only if various nations come together and find solutions jointly. Which also highlights different situations of. for example,
United Nations keeps discussing with
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | kaylee xo | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | pitruchhaya | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | Maris | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | dilipkarki | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | dilipkarki | 11 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etter handled nationally. In my opinion, global participation is very crucial to ...
^^
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rticipation is very crucial to deal with environmental problems as it gives way ...
^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...ground for better understanding of each others problem and hence finds better solution...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 513, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , as” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...if they are taken up at a global level. So, as the merits of handling environmental co...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mpact than handling the issue nationally I personally support global platform. ...
^^
Line 10, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts different situations of. for example, United Nations keeps discussing with
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, regarding, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48453608247 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12658882509 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570446735395 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.7239943181 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.769230769 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25409931861 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925729507727 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092743799899 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117052151166 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108014962142 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.