Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
History is bound to repeat itself if one does not heed the lessons of the past. By carefully studying the mistakes and successes of others in the past, one can effectively navigate the future and better more informed choices as a leader.
As a starting point, take the numerous disaster events that take great leadership to mitigate the effects of, like earthquakes, floods, and epidemics. Through careful observations of the fast spread of diseases and plague, we have learned to quarantine effected individuals to prevent further spreading of illness. Japan, a nation with frequent earthquakes has put into place government drills to get citizens used to evacuating in a organized manner. Building have better infrastructure to accomodate for quakes and the government is more apt at providing aid than in other lands where earthquakes are less common. Without paying attention to how such misfortunes were handled in the past, first responders and the overarching government would have very little success in helping victims.
Additionally, those at the forefront of cutting edge research and development have often relied upon and are inspired by past research. Much of modern day technology, such as virtual reality, have been built upon passion past minds. For example, NASA's leading department in virtual reality in the 90s based their first invention of virtual reality headset and goggles on many past endeavors, taking the idea of "glasses that transport you into another world" from the early short story "Pygmalion Spectacles." Without referring to the creative genius of the author of "Pygmalion Spectacles," the leading researchers at NASA would not have be able to imagine, let alone fathom, the idea of virtual reality so soon.
Thus, history guides the future and informs people in power and pioneers to make better decisions and to create more magnificent ideas. It is a powerful tool that aids in the development of modern day life.
- Green tea has long been hailed as an excellent source of antioxidants, powerful anti-aging and immune-system boosting compounds. Many people therefore believe that the more cups they consume each day, the greater the benefits. Green tea, however, contains 65
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your re 79
- The following was presented as part of a business plan by Apex Corporation."To answer the increased demand for artisan coffee, Apex Corporation is releasing a new line of coffee, "Gourmet Select." Apex Corporation will first introduce the c 59
- The following is a memorandum from the office of Mayor Harrison Smith Jones."In order to relieve Briggsville’s notorious traffic congestion, Mayor Harrison Smith Jones plans to build a multi-million dollar subway system. The subway will run through 58
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and sup 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s to get citizens used to evacuating in a organized manner. Building have better ...
^
Line 5, column 615, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...the author of 'Pygmalion Spectacles,' the leading researchers at NASA would ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 670, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ding researchers at NASA would not have be able to imagine, let alone fathom, the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, thus, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 33.0505617978 27% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 313.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36102236422 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01243903903 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635782747604 0.4932671777 129% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 109.237858466 60.3974514979 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.833333333 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0984100174143 0.243740707755 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318049141202 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0202913331021 0.0758088955206 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0467666711865 0.150359130593 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229680119446 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.