Some people prefer to provide help or support directly to the local community. Others prefer to give money to national or international charitable organizations. Discuss both views and give ur opinions?

Essay topics:

Some people prefer to provide help or support directly to the local community. Others prefer to give money to national or international charitable organizations. Discuss both views and give ur opinions?

Today, in this acquisitive society, supporting is one of the most important things that need to be concerned in various ways. Some people agree to send their money through national or international aid organizations while the rest do reverse trend by giving support face to face. Despite their opinions, there remain two side effects of each decision made and will be thoroughly examined as follows.

To begin with, directly provide support is an essential way for most people to have realistic views. For example, relating to poverty, voluntaries can come up with proper solutions to help impecunious students from indigent families overtaking their troubled such as donating clothes, books, and even money. Seemingly, directly donate mostly earn more respect by virtue of the interaction between people, especially inhabitants from different backgrounds. However, if the adverse effect environment is, say, climate changes, problems inhabitants faced would need the intervention from the government; otherwise, the situation may worsen.

However much directly personal donate, national or international charitable organizations nonetheless play an undoubted part in lieu. In other words, such as supporting large scales on natural disasters, and epidemics, primarily help by international organizations' budgets, if it is not, casualty might be more serious. Furthermore, other's associations can help the country to escape from the economic stagnation. Besides, small organizations can take advantage of impoverished people to earn profits for themselves; therefore, the authority as soon as understanding and managing the side effects that arise, the drawbacks can be tackled easily.

To recapitulate, although aid associations are in general better, directing donate seemingly is much more reliable and safer for those who need help.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-01 youjinnyjinnyhong 11 view
2019-10-21 ammaracca 89 view
2019-08-23 Sai sushma 73 view
2019-08-17 nguyen4562 89 view
2019-08-07 nguyenken91 56 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, in general, such as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88505747126 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19792342452 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67816091954 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6460972588 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176556248394 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607433146329 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555976777062 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953232250515 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032576461606 0.056905535591 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.