The chart below shows the percentage of UK households with selected consumer durables between 1998 and 2005. summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the percentage of households in the United Kingdom having consumer durables form 1996 to 2006. It can be clearly observed that, apart form telephone all other consumer durables gained popularity from 1996 to 2006.
With regards to Internet connection, it stood at 10 percent in 1996 and then dramatically inclined and reached its zenith point around 60 percentage in 2006. Likewise, Mobile Phone experience a two fold increase to just above a half in 2006. Fridge comprises of almost a quarter remained relatively constant in both the years.
In contrast, the usage of Microwave, Fridge and washing machine remained constant in in 1996 at about three-forth. The percentage of Microwave climbed to 80 percentile in 2006, up 10 percent from 1996. Compared to others, the situation of telephone was different. Having inclined in 1996, the percentage of telephone had fell to 88 percentage approximately.
Overall, every durable witnessed an increase in 2006 except telephone. Although telephone faced a small reduction, it stood at the top.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-19 | shiv_mark42 | 75 | view |
- More and more people ore using the internet to do their tasks rather then doing in person e g bonking shopping hotel booking etc Do the advantages of this trend outweighs the disadvantages 83
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S. from 1960 to 2011 73
- In order to solve traffic problem, governments should tax private car owner heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.what are advantages and disadvantages of such solution? 73
- In order to learn a language well, we should also learn about the country as well as the cultures and lifestyles of the people who speak this language. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of UK households with selected consumer durables between 1998 and 2005 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: APART_FORM[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'apart from'?
Suggestion: apart from
... 2006. It can be clearly observed that, apart form telephone all other consumer durables g...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...se to just above a half in 2006. Fridge comprises of almost a quarter remained relatively co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the years. In contrast, the usage of Microwave, Fridge and washing machine re...
^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...e and washing machine remained constant in in 1996 at about three-forth. The percenta...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'percentile' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'percentiles'.
Suggestion: percentiles
...e percentage of Microwave climbed to 80 percentile in 2006, up 10 percent from 1996. Compa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3630952381 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94261417359 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.478316019 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9090909091 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0836198107953 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330468074083 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393825227671 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0523690288564 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330435908199 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.