The graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children.
The bar chart illustrates how Australian children between 5 and 14 years spend their free time. They are divided in boys and girls.
As we can see, the highest bar is that of 'watching TV or videos', with a percentage of 100% in both groups. This is the most common activity not only for the Australian people, but also for all the young people in the world. At the second place there is 'Electronic or computer games' with a higher percentage of boys (80%) against only 60% of girls. It happens maybe because the number of video games only for girls is lower than that for boys.
Moreover, boys prefer sports and in air activities such as 'Skateboarding or rollerblading' and 'Bike riding'. Girls tend to select 'Art and craft' maybe because they are more practice and prefer to do handmade things.
In conclusion, the favourite activities are different between the two genres, only one is in common, watching TV.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | rahulsd | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | Nilorae | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | koinoyokan | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | koinoyokan | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Mattia95 | 78 | view |
- The graph shows Underground Station Passenger Numbers in London. 78
- The consumption of fast food in the UK from 1970 to 1990. 84
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location. 67
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The consumption of fast food in the UK from 1970 to 1990. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, second, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 752.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52178012523 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64375 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.1292814278 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.5555555556 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110924369054 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426689295129 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426346742418 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.068253148368 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259971394671 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.