Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people says that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.
Discuss both views and give your opinions.
Nowadays we all have to admit that some minority languages may disappear in the near future. Although some people argue that governments could save money by allowing this to happen, I believe that these languages should be protected and preserved.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why saving minority language could be seen as waste of money. First, if governments want to protect the languages spoken by a small number of people, expensive education programs will be needed to make sure that more people are engaged in learning it. The state have to pay for facilities, teachers and marketing campaigns as the first step to preserve minority languages. This money might be better spent on other public services that have effect on a great deal of people. Second, it is cheaper and more efficient for a country to have one language used in all aspects of life. Governments could cut all kind of cost related to communicating with citizens belonging to different minority groups.
Despite the above arguments, I highly appreciate the statement that government should preserve languages that are less widely spoken. Because a language's function is much more than a mean of communication, it has a vital connection with the culture identity of people who speak it. Language is an important element in formation of person's thoughts, behaviors and origins. If a language becomes extinct, a predictable consequences is a way of life will disappear with it. We will lose cultural diversity that makes societies more interesting. Last but not least, by spending money on language preservation, governments could also preserve traditions, customs that are parts of country's history.
In conclusion, I believe that use budget on protecting minority languages is not wasted because in long term, this would have extremely positive impact on cultural heritage of states and individuals.
- Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share the same fashions, advertising, brands, eating habits, and TV channels.Do the disadvantages of this trend outweigh the advantages? 67
- Water is natural resource that should always be free. Governments should ban the sale of bottled water.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people says that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both vi 92
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
- The graph shows changes of amount and type of fast food consumed by teenagers in Australia from 1975 to 2000. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...want to protect the languages spoken by a small number of people, expensive education programs wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'consequence'?
Suggestion: consequence
...language becomes extinct, a predictable consequences is a way of life will disappear with it...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23355263158 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85133241136 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588815789474 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8884692098 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.066666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317789687917 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986597725866 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814435956632 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186125357366 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587780156912 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.