The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
The depicted table illustrates the comparative data about changes in modes of travel in England for over fifteen years.
Overall, it is clear that all modes of transport seem to have gradually increased except walking, bicycle as well as a local bus. However, the car makes up the highest portion whereas the taxi is undoubtedly the lowest throughout the years.
To initiate, there was a dramatic growth in the number of car users in England in 3199 in 1985, followed by a sharp increase to 4806 in 2000. However, the distance traveled by the number of train users had experienced a decrease to 289 in 1985, before hitting an upward trend to 366 in 2000.
On the contrary, walking, bicycle, and the local bus had experienced a downward trend. Furthermore, long-distance bus, taxi, and other modes seem to increase in both particular years.
- All cars that born fossil fuels should be banned and electronic cars should replace them. 89
- The diagram below shows the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960. 73
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the three countries from 1990 to 2004 87
- People today move to new cities or new countries more than ever before. What challenges do they experience? What strategies are there to meet these challenges? 78
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, well, whereas, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 712.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 143.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97902097902 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72506634797 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629370629371 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.3197235499 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.714285714 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213281920602 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899832509216 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991246248732 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131080731309 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113042003139 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.