Should company top level authorities take employees’ suggestions while making any decisions?
The importance of authorities which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial others reject of this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my view for favoring the positive effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons of this trend which will further explain this argument but the most important one stems from fact of this trend is that employees are work better than under the employers and also they work very very neat & clean. Another pivotal aspect is that employees make the environment like home. Needless to say, that all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits of this argument but one of the crucial effect is that employees don’t work under the employers. Moreover, employees are better understand what is need to Comoros and sanctification. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that the benefits of authorities are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-11 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | dalwindergill | 11 | view |
- Some people argue laws changes human behavior. Where some disagree. Do you agree with it. 11
- Do you think studying old drama’s and plays is as important as studying books. 75
- Cars and planes have become a significant part of modern life. What is your opinion? 77
- Should big companies use offers and discount as their marketing strategy How does it affect their reputation 57
- Should company top level authorities take employees’ suggestions while making any decisions? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ad to a logical conclusion. There are myriad of reasons of this trend which wi...
^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: very
... under the employers and also they work very very neat & clean. Another pivotal aspect is...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 214.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1214953271 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76407455879 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602803738318 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 379.143842365 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5190845348 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6363636364 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0699400816772 0.242375264174 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299776694223 0.0925447433944 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349682084402 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0470402024298 0.151781067708 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220080511315 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.