Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Television is one of the most important inventions of modern science and it has both advantages and drawbacks to watch. From my perspective, I strongly agree with the statement that the direction of the advertisement of television should not focus on young children especially two to five aged people for the following reasons.
Firstly, it will inspire them to watch television and it will turn into a habit that may be disastrous consequences for their future life. For example, when I was in my cousin house, I have figured out that my younger cousin has no interest to study or do anything such as playing a game or go outside without watching television. He was addicted to watching television and his favorite serial was cartoon series especially Doraemon. After a few months, I heard that his result of the final examination was so pathetic and obviously it was the reason for watching too many programs on television.
Secondly, it may be the reason for the fall in danger in their life. For instance, once I had watched an animation movie which name was "Moana”. It was about adventurous teenager sails out on a daring mission to save her people. Undoubtedly, it was a nice movie but as I live in near sea beach, I was worried about my younger brother. He was very much fond of this type of movie and he might attempt to do this type of activities from the inspiration of this type of movie. As he was not able to swim in the sea, it made me upset to figure out the risk of his life.
Finally, I would like to say that it's really difficult to provide a lucid explanation of this statement. According to the above discussions, it is concluded that television advertising direction should not focus on young children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | rezamousavi666 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | nusybah | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | jiyakavya | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | jason_linnil | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Bobby1987 | 86 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- ome parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 70
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree about the statement, “parents should allow their children to use electronic devices for only 1 hour or allow them to use electronics as they like. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68954248366 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87123074586 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562091503268 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5409888081 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157030089786 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615804572923 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103371220576 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137095811727 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11268008058 0.0645574589148 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.