Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
hediepofioh jopo3kopj jof p43bbklfjjrve lhijfrnjf hije noj nkf; joj ukj hijo hij hj j hi hij ji ukij hlh bh hi bl lkh hh h hhhhuhnnn uui tt uihui huhuih guhuihuih nihuih dtsg fghyfg ghb fy hg io h gui gyg f f ygy gf ghf vjfy ghff ff fuffyu gutb hsqjjs rwhrf gvt fdfvehjv vg gj gg vhj g jhg jgb jg fugn vghn guh nvgh yihioiouigu uigui uiui uiuo uiyiu hih gkjg jkjk jygiu jg gu ugugu fygui guiy futui gu chjf ugjtghffhffg yu yutu fyg fjf cghf vjhj fg cjf fjf hjf hjf hjf jhf f gjg hjg fhjfn fyjyg hjfjg tjyg fjg jfjg fyj nfyfyb fygvvg fyfj b hhfd hfdjd hcj fytfyu guy fjfguyfjfhrwio uiy43 hio3uhu4 hjfd hd hij yh fg cjgl fgi fhilj xg xjgukhi xglh dil xhfuk dfuk gu hdj fxdjg gjyduk xjyj hdghg cgg chgfg
- Incresing the price of petrol directly way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems.Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 11
- Incresing the price of petrol directly way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems.Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Incresing the price of petrol directly way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems.Do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hediepofioh
hediepofioh jopo3kopj jof p43bbklfjjrve lhijfrnjf h...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rnjf hije noj nkf; joj ukj hijo hij hj j hi hij ji ukij hlh bh hi bl lkh hh h hhh...
^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l lkh hh h hhhhuhnnn uui tt uihui huhuih guhuihuih nihuih dtsg fghyfg ghb fy hg ...
^^
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nn uui tt uihui huhuih guhuihuih nihuih dtsg fghyfg ghb fy hg io h gui gyg f f y...
^^
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: f
...uih dtsg fghyfg ghb fy hg io h gui gyg f f ygy gf ghf vjfy ghff ff fuffyu gutb h...
^^^
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hg io h gui gyg f f ygy gf ghf vjfy ghff ff fuffyu gutb hsqjjs rwhrf gvt fdfvehj...
^^
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f f ygy gf ghf vjfy ghff ff fuffyu gutb hsqjjs rwhrf gvt fdfvehjv vg gj gg vhj g...
^^
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ehjv vg gj gg vhj g jhg jgb jg fugn vghn guh nvgh yihioiouigu uigui uiui uiuo uiy...
^^
Line 1, column 464, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: hjf
...fg yu yutu fyg fjf cghf vjhj fg cjf fjf hjf hjf hjf jhf f gjg hjg fhjfn fyjyg hjfjg tjy...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 532, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...jfn fyjyg hjfjg tjyg fjg jfjg fyj nfyfyb fygvvg fyfj b hhfd hfdjd hcj fytfyu guy ...
^^
Line 1, column 573, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fygvvg fyfj b hhfd hfdjd hcj fytfyu guy fjfguyfjfhrwio uiy43 hio3uhu4 hjfd hd h...
^^
Line 1, column 589, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hfd hfdjd hcj fytfyu guy fjfguyfjfhrwio uiy43 hio3uhu4 hjfd hd hij yh fg cjgl fg...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 13.1623246493 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 0.0 24.0651302605 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 41.998997996 0% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 559.0 1615.20841683 35% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 142.0 315.596192385 45% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 3.93661971831 5.12529762239 77% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 4.20363070211 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30802271553 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.908450704225 0.561755894193 162% => OK
syllable_count: 94.5 506.74238477 19% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 0.7 1.60771543086 44% => Avg_syllables_per_word is low.
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 142.0 20.2975951904 700% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 559.0 106.682146367 524% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 142.0 20.7667163134 684% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 0.0 7.06120827912 0% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 5.01903807615 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 68.1 13.0946893788 520% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 3.49 50.2224549098 7% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 48.0 11.3001002004 425% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 6.76 12.4159519038 54% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 13.35 8.58950901804 155% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 78.4519038076 31% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 52.0 9.78957915832 531% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 58.8 10.1190380762 581% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 59.0 10.7795591182 547% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.