do you agree or disagree, people should not spend lots od money on pets?
In the recent hectic era, people has become very bounded with animals; to put it with another word, Lot of families nowadays have one or tow pets. There is a controversial debate which is often raised about spending too much money on pets. Some people hold the voice that having pet is very costive, however there is another body of evidence that casts doubt on these beliefs. From a personal perspective, the former point carries more weight, given that life today burdens people’s shoulder with lots of stress, expenses, and responsibility. Below I will strive my supportive point with more details.
The foremost point, since the beginning of the last century, life has become vey expensive that forces people to be savvier. A vivid example can be given to shed a light on what was elaborated above is, in the developed industrial countries such as Canada and United State of America the cost of living has become very high, given that both parents should work to earn more money. Furthermore, pets such as cats or dogs require several different shots throughout their first year; in addition to preventative shots and treatment which costs lot of money. Consequently, it is better in this costly life to save money to use it in other things such as kids’ education or even enjoyment.
Next, coupled with high cost of living, responsibility is another drawback of having pets. Just like a young child, pets rely on people for absolutely everything. Not only because they yet have to be trained, but also they do not understand people’s anger if they do something wrong. A recent survey conducted by Oxford university found that, people who are overscheduled life cannot take the responsibility for having a pet. Therefore, having pets is big responsibility.
Although the previous reasons are the first one which a cross the mind at a glance, they are not the only reasons available. In fact, there is another subtle point which must be born in mind. Life nowadays is very stressful which makes people want to take some break for enjoyment. However, having a pet could restrict their free time. For example, in California there are lot of entertainment places that do not allow the presence of pet such as Great America, 6 Flags, and Santa Cruz, to that end people should leave their pet in suitable place like a pets hotel that will be extra cost. As a result, provided that people decide to have a pet, they should be prepared to take these challenges.
Taking everything into a consideration, without a doubt people who spend too much money on their pets they should better use for this money. It is suggested that people compromise to achieve responsibility/ enjoyment life balance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
- parents should encourage their children to take part-time jobs 3
- do you agree or disagree? young people today do no give enough time to help in communities? 90
- tpo 42 63
- do you agree or disagree, people should not spend lots od money on pets? 80
- some people believe that schools with the same-age are better, while others think that schools with girls, and boys are more effective? which approach do you prefer? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y supportive point with more details. The foremost point, since the beginning ...
^^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...more, pets such as cats or dogs require several different shots throughout their first year; in a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ds' education or even enjoyment. Next, coupled with high cost of living, ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...by Oxford university found that, people who are overscheduled life cannot take the resp...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, having pets is big responsibility. Although the previous reasons are the fi...
^^^
Line 7, column 558, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pets'' or 'pet's'?
Suggestion: pets'; pet's
...eave their pet in suitable place like a pets hotel that will be extra cost. As a res...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be prepared to take these challenges. Taking everything into a consideration, ...
^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsibility/ enjoyment life balance.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2270.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95633187773 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71586671245 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543668122271 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8907442257 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.181818182 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264723764862 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765063151734 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605190285741 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163152303516 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406670062771 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.