Animals should not be used for the benefit of human beings unless there is evidence that the animals do not suffer in any way. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Currently, there is a lot of controversy about using animals for human needs. Animal rights activists are trying to stop all modern and traditional activities, which involve killing animals or cause their suffering. Traditionalists are trying to convince the community that using living creatures for men's needs is natural and cannot be avoided in everyday life. This essay will explore it in detail.
On one hand, activists, who defend animal rights, are preaching the world not to use animals in any way. Moreover, they believe that animals should have exactly same rights as humans do. The reason is that people and animals are both living creatures and there shouldn't be any difference in treating them. So-called extreme vegans are refusing to eat any food of animal origin, even milk or honey. Apart from this, killing animals and keeping them in captivity cause animals suffering and is perceived uncivilized.
On the other side, traditionalists disagree with the statement that human should stop killing animals or using them to fulfill their needs. As, from the very beginning of human civilization, there is a tradition and vital need to use animals as a food and their parts in traditional crafts. Without proteins and vitamins of animal origin, the human body wouldn't receive all nutrients it needs. Moreover, testing some medicals on animals already helped to fight many diseases people suffered from.
To conclude, people have the moral right to use animals to their benefit, to some extent. Animals should not be led to suffer and die for our fun. Although, using animals for food is natural for humans as predators, but as civilized predators, we should make sure to use only humane ways of killing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-18 | vishal sachdeva | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | vishal sachdeva | 81 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | vishal sachdeva | 73 | view |
- Some people think that using animals for experimentation purpose is cruel but other people think that is necessary for the development of science Discuss both views and give your opinion 70
- Some people think that it is important to have a single language as an international official language Others think that it will make it difficult to identify countries and cause a loss of culture What are your opinions on this 73
- Some people think that using animals for experimentation purpose is cruel but other people think that is necessary for the development of science Discuss both views and give your opinion 91
- In some cultures the old age is more valued while in some cultures youth is more valued Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Nowadays international tourism is the biggest industry in the world Unfortunately international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...als are both living creatures and there shouldnt be any difference in treating them. So-...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 355, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...tamins of animal origin, the human body wouldnt receive all nutrients it needs. Moreove...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14893617021 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58434743551 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8090474374 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.75 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0625 7.06120827912 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446347927028 0.244688304435 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149789338767 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649240640267 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281188318122 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662970369199 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.