The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three catagories, from 1995-2002
Depicted by the chart is the information about how long (in billions minute) different kinds of telephone calls, local, national, and mobiles, are made by people living in the UK over 7-year period since 1995.
Overall, it is apperant that while the general trend for mobile and national and international calls showed a sligth increase, the figure for local calls increased than decreased during the period.
By 1995, the number of local calls stood at just over 70, which is the highest figure shown. Likewise, the figure, reached a peak at 90 (1999), before ,eventually, decreasing slightly by around 18 at the end of period.
The level of national and international and mobiles calls, on the other hand, had a similar pattern during the timeline. For the former, the number rose gradually, climbing from just under 40 in 1995 to just above 60 by 2002. Meanwhile, for the letter, the level showed ninefold growth, from around 5 (1995) to approximately 45 (2002) to be specific.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-08 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry. 84
- the graph shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- The diagram below shows the number of landline ownership telephones per 1000 people in different countries over a five-year period. 78
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 78
- Today the internet and TV have created chance for ordinary people to become famous. Is it a positive or negative development? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 149, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...igure, reached a peak at 90 1999, before ,eventually, decreasing slightly by aroun...
^^
Line 13, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ern during the timeline. For the former, the number rising gradually, rising from...
^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...approximately 45 2002 to be specific.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99390243902 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63557859662 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640243902439 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6005931393 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208886295314 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871057862327 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590057375415 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110753820622 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386014217181 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.