The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons.
The chart compares the points scored by three different teams over a four-year period from 2002 to 2005.
Overall, it is clear that there was a fluctuation in the scores of all the teams during shown. Also, the points scored by team B were much higher than the scores of the other teams.
In 2002, team B achieved its highest total, 82 points. In contrast, the figures for team A and team C were lower the scores of team B, which were 5 and 10 points, respectively. The period between 2002 and 2004 saw a dramatic increase in the scores of team A, reaching a peak of 35 points in 2004. The totals of team C remained relatively stable at between 10 and 15 points, because the scores of team B fell steadily from their peak in 2002 to a low figure of 43 points in 2004.
There was then a rise in the team B score to 55 points in 2005. On the other hand, team A saw a fall in its score to 8 points, slightly higher than team C with 5 points.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | 89 | view |
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over 4 different seasons.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 56
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over 4 different seasons.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 56
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A B and C over four different seasons 67
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons. 73
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 103, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...rast, the figures for team A and team C were lower the scores of team B, which were ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.15675675676 4.92477711251 84% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2473358954 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497297297297 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 202.5 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0238014308 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4444444444 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303959012558 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152718570461 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839251323574 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22771460539 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837693643252 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 93.48 61.2550243902 153% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.85 11.4140731707 60% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.68 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.