Instead of training a few athletes to win medals at the Olympics, governments should spend the money on programmes encouraging the public to be active and stay healthy.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It has been argued for quite a long time that the sports authorities should spend a large amount of money on the general public to motivate them to stay fit and healthy rather than spending the whole budget on a few selected players. I partially believe that the government should encourage people to participate in multiple sports, such as Hockey, Football and other outdoor activities. In this essay, I will provide relevant examples and reasons to support my opinion.
To begin with, government authorities should run some kind of campaigns to motivate people about different outdoor activities. Also, the sports authorities can create some mandatory laws, which force people to do some kind of physical workouts. Playing games could help people to stay fit and healthy. This could also help the vast majority of people rather than a few athletes who are going to take part in the Olympics. In many popular countries, for instance, citizens are required to do some kind of outdoor activities daily so that they can stay away from illness or any kind of diseases.
On the other hand, providing special training to national players is also important. Because they represent our nation globally, they need to be trained hard. Winning a medal in the Olympics has been a dream of every countryman, especially for the young generation. However, it also helps our country to gain some power internationally. It creates a great country's image all over the world. For example, the United States of America has been involved in all types of sports and always been on the top of the medal tally, because the US government invested a large amount of money on national players.
To sum up, governing bodies should encourage people to play major sports and push them to take part. Additionally, they should raise awareness among them could help stay fit and healthy. But, many big sports events like the Olympics should not be ignored completely and players should also be trained equally.
- You have recently retired from a government job. It has been over two months and you have not received your pension order yet.Write a letter to company manager informing about this and troubles that you have been facing.In your letter- Introduce yourself- 56
- Your local council has decided to close the only park in your town and build a car park in its place You believe this will have a bad effect on the people who live and work in the town Write a letter to the mayor In your letter introduce yourself explain 95
- Advertising encourages consumers to buy in quantity rather than promoting quality To what extent do you agree or disagree 51
- Some people believe that it is a good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views 73
- The use of cell phones mobile phones has grown rapidly in the past few years People use them for both business and personal reasons What are the advantages and disadvantages of the widespread use of cell phones mobile phones 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ld spend a large amount of money on the general public to motivate them to stay fit and health...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00602409639 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57725741246 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551204819277 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6452466912 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7647058824 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225139856145 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655381946917 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363617778821 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134384866797 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300225676114 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.