Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any diseace? pure & cons?
The importance of doctor does with video communication help to cure any disease of patient, which has always debatable, has now upsurged a lot of arguments in favor and against it, thus it has become even more controversy over the potential of this trend in an integral part of the society in recent years. It can be agreed that upside of doctor does with video communication help to cure any disease of patient is instrumental indeed however it has some various drawback as well. This easy will be elaborate both assertion and will provide to a well- weighted conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why doctor does with video communication help to doctor to cure any disease of patient is unreservedly salient, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that it is very time safely process because every persons busy in their life and not have to for our body and other works so it is very use full for the busy persons.
However, there are some people, who choose to think differently and hold on opposing viewpoint, which can certainly over where potential influence of doctor does with video communication help to cure any disease of patient? Nevertheless, the contradiction is rooted in the fact that without physically or face to face checkup doctor cannot understand the actual problem of any patients for example once time I went to checkup for doctor because certainly pain start in my stack but doctor was absent he was not available in clinic and compounder say to doctor on video call but he cannot understand my problem he given me medicine of infection but actually problem was stones in my stack.
Overall conclude that treatment on video communication is cannot not proper treatment.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-14 | English time | 77 | view |
- pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. 55
- Give your opinion whether formal written examination is an effective way to assess student. 85
- Polygamy has increased widely in recent years what solutions can you brought forward to decrease this issue? 88
- More information available online, so library books are useless. Agree or disagree. 77
- Experience is more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87755102041 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72064622257 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540816326531 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6551724138 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 20.5024630542 205% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 131.465833227 50.4703680194 260% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 204.857142857 104.977214359 195% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.0 20.9669160288 200% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.25397266985 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404376882865 0.242375264174 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206063384253 0.0925447433944 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129326600377 0.071462118173 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234883563965 0.151781067708 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900752194962 0.0609392437508 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.6 12.6369458128 179% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.85 53.1260098522 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 10.9458128079 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.94827586207 191% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.3980295567 181% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.5123152709 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.