The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
The bar chart illustrates the differences of the common house in five various cities, New York, Madrid, Tokyo, Frankfurt and London in the first half of 1990s and 1996-2002. Overall, as it can be seen the range of changes in the cities was about -7 to 3 percent in the first period, while in the second time span, a significant increase is shown.
According to the presented data in the graph, a 7% fall is happend in the capital cities of Japan and the United Kingdom in 1990-95, while this change was extremely high in london and was achieved more than 10% in the second duration. On the other hand, the variation in tokyo was not significant. There are a 10 % rose for price of average house in new york and rose from -5 to +5 percent. Madrid and Frankfurt had positive percentages in the first years in the contrary of others. Madrid's ration had an upward trend and started by almost 2% and stood on a little less than five percent. Finally, the last country is Frankfurt in Germany which has a minor decline. The average price was approximately 3% and steady decrease to roughly 2%.
- When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 92
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. 78
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine.However, at best these methods are ineffective, and at worst they may be dangerous.To what extent do you agree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any rel 61
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West park Secondary School since its construction in 1950. 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52791878173 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49391157407 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619289340102 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6452609099 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1111111111 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208174322065 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748844974694 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738740403108 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15950041892 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00167422848486 0.0819641961636 2% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.