Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
There is a common trend that people make it possible to purchase items in similarities from different countries all over the wold. Personally, I believe that this development is largely detrimental to economy and culture worldwide.
Firstly, the same international commodities sold widely have a negative influence on economic activity in each country. Although globalization, is a main ingredient to promote international trade, allows customer to buy the same products and follow the same trends anywhere, the less developed countries have to compete aggressively to big brands from the developing ones. For example, Vietnamese people prefer to shop for fashionable clothes from high-end transnational stores rather to buy clothes from local stores that sell " made in Vietnam" products.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-17 | milu_123 | 22 | view |
2019-09-15 | yazhtut | 61 | view |
2019-07-25 | Billynguyen1225 | 84 | view |
2019-05-22 | cocococo123 | 56 | view |
2019-05-22 | cocococo123 | 56 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantage of this outweigh the disadvantage? 84
- Some people believe that the advent of economical air travel has been very beneficial by making international travel more accessible while others argue that it has had a very negative impact Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 81
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 22
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 78
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 41.998997996 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 683.0 1615.20841683 42% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 119.0 315.596192385 38% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73949579832 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.30283395202 4.20363070211 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18384276338 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 176.041082164 48% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.714285714286 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 506.74238477 44% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 16.0721442886 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0835091627 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.6 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179324075303 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864849640526 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406727516121 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13390496208 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00750183833696 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 22.4719101124 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.