The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates some information about the numbers of waste which were produced by three enterprises from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, it is clear that three companies saw a fluctuation in the produced waste amount over 15-year period. There was increase in figure of company C while other enterprises declined between 2000 and 2015.
It can be seen that in 2000, the most amount of waste was produced by company A, at about 12 tonnes. this wasting number declined steadily to around 11 tonnes in 2005 and fell sharply to more than 8 tonnes in 2015. By contrast, from approximately 8 tonnes of waste in 2000 of company, it reached a peak of about 10 tonnes in 2005 before dropping dramatically to exactly 3 tonnes at the end of period.
Over the same period, the lowest amount of waste was in company C. The figure of waste of this company was more than 4 tonnes in 2000, it rose slightly to 6 tonnes in 2005 and then increased significantly to above 10 tonnes. it was, therefore, the highest amount of waste at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Adeola Nafisat | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Jerusha Roy Festus | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Jerusha Roy Festus | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | Bao Trang | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of females aged 16 25 in a particular country who participated in sports compared with the percentage of people who watched them in 2000 89
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. 73
- The graph shows the percentage of adolescents following a vegerarian diet. 73
- The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15 year olds spending chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK 67
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...duced by company A, at about 12 tonnes. this wasting number declined steadily to aro...
^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...eased significantly to above 10 tonnes. it was, therefore, the highest amount of w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56914893617 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57123500173 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.092473823 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4444444444 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221059994761 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125683470482 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955897963119 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163905718575 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517545657627 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.