possibility of flying Pterosaurs
The main topic of both the reading and the lecture center around the possibility of flying Pterosaurs. The author of the text lists three reasons that he thinks this theory is impossible. However, the lecturer refutes all three ideas one by one.
First, the text asserts that these animals were probably cold-blooded same as modern reptiles. So, they had a slow metabolism and were unable to produce a myriad of energy for flight. In contrast, the speaker points out that these reptiles had dense hair-like covering keep them warm. They were warm-blooded and had a high body temperature. Therefore, they had enough energy for flight.
Furthermore, the reading states that pterosaurs had large and heavy bodies which made them unable to flap their wings fast enough to stay aloft for and length of time. Conversely, the lecturer underlines the fact that they had special anatomical features that made them low weight. She mentions that they had hollow bones instead of solid bones which were not heavy.
Finally, the author claims that according to fossil evidence, these animals did not have big, powerful muscles in their back legs to launch themselves into the air. Thus, if these animals wanted to launch like birds, they need strong muscles. On the other hands, the speaker dismisses this idea, pointing out that pterosaurs were different from birds because birds use two limbs for their jumping, but these reptiles used all four their limbs to run fast and jump high enough.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-10 | Shahjahan khandakar | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | joeyrussell007 | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-14 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | subashdevkota | 3 | view |
- degree 70
- Do you agree or disagree?Although science and technology will continue to improve, the most significant improvement for the quality of people’s lives have already taken place 73
- possibility of flying Pterosaurs 3
- Do you agree or disagree?Although science and technology will continue to improve, the most significant improvement for the quality of people’s lives have already taken place 73
- Do you agree or disagree?Although science and technology will continue to improve, the most significant improvement for the quality of people’s lives have already taken place 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r refutes all three ideas one by one. First, the text asserts that these anima...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, they had enough energy for flight. Furthermore, the reading states that pte...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of solid bones which were not heavy. Finally, the author claims that accordin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05284552846 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33999855375 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613821138211 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.4855678817 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7857142857 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0814445642054 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254956148658 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625064944202 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0498117057388 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456539349132 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.