the chart below shows information on the percentage of british people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 aND 2010.
The chart depicts the percentage of donation given by British people among the years 1990 and 2010.
In 1990, the overall percentage of charity was high as compared to the percentage in the year 2010. The highest amount of donation has been given by the people of age group of 36 to 50 in the year 1990. On the other hand, in the year 2010, the percentage was maximun for the people of age group 51-65. The least amount of charity is done by the age group 18 to 25, which is 16% and 6% in the year 1990 and 2010 respectively.
The increase in the charity has been observed in the year 1990 for the age group varies between 18 -25 to 51-65. However, the increasing pattern changed and faced a decrease for the age group of 51 to 66 in the year 2010. People of age group 51-65 and >65 has given more charity in the year 2010 as compared to the year 1990. The percentage of charity for age group 51-65 was 35% and 39% in the years 1990 and 2010 respectively.
Overall, we can say that British people contribute a good percentage of amount in the charity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | exdiscipulus | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | manaswi.ielts | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | azizkhon | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Zuna-ira | 67 | view |
- You need to borrow some money to pay for something you need for your work or studies. Write a letter to your bank to ask for a loan. In your letterintroduce yourself and ask for a loansay why you need the moneyexplain how you plan to pay the money back 73
- People born today can expect to live longer than people in previous generations. What are some of the positive and negative implications of this phenomenon?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experienc 67
- A friend has agreed to look after your house and pet while you are on holiday.Write a letter to your friend. In your lettertell your friend how they can contact you when you are awaygive instructions about how to care for your petdescribe other things the 73
- People nowadays prefer to interact online e g do shopping chat with friends rather than talking to other people face to face What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant exa 81
- Many people believe that social networking sites (Such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.To what extent do you agree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.30845771144 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28815700589 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.388059701493 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 7.73886296558 43.030603864 18% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.6 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429499683962 0.215688989381 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.23553896668 0.103423049105 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709609287387 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295218441975 0.15604864568 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978757615603 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.72 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.44 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.