The line graph illustrates the consumption of 3 kinds of spreads(Margarine, Low fat & reduced spreads, and Butter) between 1981 and 2007.
The line graph illustrates the consumption of 3 kinds of spreads (Margarine, Low fat & reduced spreads, and Butter) between 1981 and 2007.
Overall, the Margarine and Butter followed the downward trend, whereas Low fat and reduced spreads rose considerably. However, all the 3 types of spreads experienced fluctuations in between the initial and final stages of a given duration.
Firstly, the usage of Margarine experienced a rise of approximately 20 grams in the period from 1981 to 1986 whereas, the usage of Butter fallen by around the same quantity. The consumption of Butter was then drastically dropped by 2007 and its count was almost 50 grams. On the other hand, Margarine though fluctuated in between, also was observed to be dipping to its lowest point of consumption that is 40 grams.
Secondly, the consumption of Low Fat and reduced spreads jumped from 10 grams in 1996 to almost 82 grams in 2001 and then decreased steadily to 75 grams in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-02 | ayshaaaaaaaa2018@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | rushabh71 | 78 | view |
- The given line chart demonstrates the consumption of three spreads, during the period of 1981 to 2007. 73
- The bar chart below shows the results of a survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on two groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance. 78
- Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Reason: The world today is significantly more complex than it was even in the relatively recent past. 58
- Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals. 50
- The bar chart below shows the results of a survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on two groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was almost 50 grams. On the other hand, Margarine though fluctuated in between, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03726708075 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83193434894 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55900621118 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.3888566056 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.857142857 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 5.23603664747 246% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467513947064 0.215688989381 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.233501181261 0.103423049105 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.293259152514 0.0843802449381 348% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.360255411888 0.15604864568 231% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.336049099527 0.0819641961636 410% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.