Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that an increase in the sales of prevalent consumer merchandises is originated from advertising rather than our actual demands. There are good arguments both for and against this view, but I believe this depends on different reasons.
I completely concur with the idea that advertising leads to higher consumption of some ubiquitous consumer goods. The first prominent justification is that advertising has manipulated consumer behavior. It is acknowledged that advertisers have been striving to persuade people that purchasing a commodity will make them more delighted. Furthermore, the purpose of advertising is not only altering behaviors but also causing humans to live in a consumer culture, which means that as soon as advertising occurred, people inclined to follow the latest trend and associate certain brands with higher status. Following latest trendy outfit is a prime example for consumerism which is stimulated by advertising. Consequently, the growing sales of some popular consumer products stem partly from the manipulation of advertisers.
However, I believe that raising sales of several common consumer goods are also driven by the true needs of the community. First, the health aspect of consumer goods, especially healthy foods, plays a more pivotal role in our awareness. It is due to the fact that the occurrence of foodborne diseases has raised the awareness of food safety. The whole food, for instance, is one of the agricultural products gaining popularity in real demands. Second, there are increasing sales of high-tech products which are indispensable for end-users without much advertising. As a matter of fact, if electronic devices had not appeared, humans would have failed to deal with a ton of tasks in work as well as daily activities as in today’s society. As a result, the true needs of humans also determine a rise in consumer products.
In conclusion, while reasons can be given to justify that advertising is the reason for rising the sales of common consumer goods rather than the real demands of people, I believe this is not an accurate statement under any circumstances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | gulbakhyt_90 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | trucn | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Aydin03 | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Aydin03 | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | khanhptk162 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 74
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than h 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of men and women who did various free time activities in England in 2006 49
- Popular hobbies and interests change over time and are more a reflection of trends and fashions than an indication of what individuals really want to do in their spare time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight. Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34808259587 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00503257226 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566371681416 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4656055522 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.3125 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220591482666 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686936546884 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037953383195 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125993445689 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269009242663 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.