It is sometimes said that the countryside offers a high quality of life, especially for families. What are the arguments for and against families choosing to live and work in the countryside, for example as farmers? What is your own view about this?
There is a widely accepted fact that households who live in the countryside contain a life with high qualities. However, living and working in this area might bring some challenges as well as some benefits, even for farmers. This essay deals with the arguments of both sides of this polemical issue before reaching a concluding viewpoint.
On the one hand, some might argue that settling in rural areas has particular drawbacks. The first well-known reason behind this idea is the scarcity of amenities. These range from sports clubs, museums, theaters, educational facilities, and even proper healthcare sections. Evident for this can be seen in different locations of the world, especially in far-flung areas. Another negative point in the countryside seems to be the issue of unemployment. Since career options are limited in the rustic atmosphere for both young and old, the majority of ruralist might deal with this problem which in long-term results in rural poverty. The final disadvantage tends to be a matter of isolation due to the conurbation in large cities. Moreover, as young members of the countryside migrate to capitals and major cities, old rural dwellers become alone, which affects their emotional status and leads to depression.
By stark contrast, life in the countryside has a wide range of benefits. Rural residents are more healthier than city dwellers, meaning that due to the contiguity of bare lands, people can plant organic fruits and vegetables, irritating them with clean water tables like rivers and springs. Besides, they require fresh and salubrious air which is absent in most of the cities. Even though the village and farms are located far from the capitals, technology development and widespread use of it in every piece of the world contributes to the reduction in a cultural backwater in rural areas. Provided that, children can use remote learning and viewing online attractions such as museums in their leisure times. Furthermore, where parents are farmers, children become more in tune with the natural environment and might learn various duties like animal husbandry, crop irrigation, and value the nature more than children who live in cities.
In conclusion, it is logical to declare that although living in the countryside might look onerous and has some challenges, in my viewpoint, through expansive use of internet and technology, the advantages outweigh its disadvantages. Life is healthy in this areas additionally.
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. 78
- Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so. Consider the arguments from both aspects 84
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. 78
- It is sometimes said that the countryside offers a high quality of life especially for families What are the arguments for and against families choosing to live and work in the countryside for example as farmers What is your own view about this 95
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'healthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: healthier
... range of benefits. Rural residents are more healthier than city dwellers, meaning that due to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...h its disadvantages. Life is healthy in this areas additionally.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2082.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29770992366 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80871082807 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595419847328 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8724358962 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.578947368 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6842105263 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144323174407 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443965565581 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461712999199 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959712772131 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582149367953 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.