Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today. Some people think that it will improve people’s lives in many ways. Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is true that whether demerits or merits genetic engineering would bring about our lives in the future is a subject of debate. From my perspective, while there are some reasons given to justify the latter, the former is more preferable.
On the one hand, some people suppose that genetic engineering would enhance our living standards in the future. The first prominent justification is that this kind of technology could help people cure some diseases, including replacing body parts. In some cases, for those who suffer serious damages from accidents or cancer, this would be an incredible way to help them live longer. Furthermore, genetic engineering could improve the productivity of breeds for farmers. In other words, this technology might stimulate the development of agricultural sectors, resulting in an increase in foods for people.
On the other hand, some people advocate that manipulating the genes of an organism can cause risks for our lives in the long run. First, in the era of this technology, parents could desire to choose their children’s characteristics. This would be regarded as an unfair approach for the underprivileged due to its expensive price. Second, the ability to change the genome of humans could lead to cloning. If cloning is permitted, the genes of the strongest people will be weaponized for wars by creating soldiers for some countries, which might result in a further increase in human suffering. Also, as clones are not prohibited, it could be used for criminal purposes by disguising any people. Moreover, genetic intervention is prone to be one of the key factors influencing the whole ecosystem by changing the genes of food. For instance, if crops are resistant to predators, food chains could be broken.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, although genetic engineering could have positive effects on our lives, it seems to me that it would bring risks to our society in the long term.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | shayma | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | samjimathew | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | MD Camryn | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | thanhlan0201 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Yui | 78 | view |
- It has been said that people who read for pleasure have more developed imaginations and language skill than people who prefer to watch TV. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- In recent years, more and more people tend to live individualy. What are the causes of this trend? Does this have a positive or negative effect on society? 84
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The chart below gives information about car ownership per household in the UK from 1975 to 2005. 67
- It has been said that people who read for pleasure have more developed imaginations and language skill than people who prefer to watch TV. Do you agree or disagree? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in other words, in some cases, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19496855346 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89638347282 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6940719971 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8125 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185909536339 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653335756058 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441702776892 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109132100381 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484081627038 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.