Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The bar chart illustrates comparative statistics on the percentage of male, female and children who intake the fruits and vegetables regularly of the Uk people in 2002, 2006 ad 2010.
Overall, the female had the highest percentage of consumption of fruits and vegetables over the period while children had the lowest consumption. In the Period 2006 holds the highest number of consumption of fruits and vegetables of the UK people.
Looking <span class="hiddenSpellError"></span>into the graph, the amount of consumption of fruits and vegetables in the year 2002 of men and women was almost equal (respectively 22% and 25%) and children consumed only 11%. As the year progressed consumption of fruits and vegetables was increased for men, women, and children <span class="hiddenGrammarError"></span>respectively 26%, 32% and 18% in 2006.
Remaining part of the graph, the intake of fruits and vegetables is slightly decreased in the year 2010 when compared to 2006. Men were diminished to 24% where women 26% and children dropped to 16%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-26 | yeu192 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | yeu192 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | Gaddam Ramya | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007. 67
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010. 61
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 67
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70186335404 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 5.91525481903 2.65546596893 223% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515527950311 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.800244267 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.142857143 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193066271623 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103967035577 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603651593873 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13454265859 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055858996132 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.4140731707 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.