The changing trends of the amount of three kinds of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
Given is a line graph which illustrates the changing trends of the frequencies that Australian teenagers consumed three kinds of popular fast foods during the period from 1975 to 2000.
It’s clearly that, in 1975, the Fish and Chips was consumed about 100 times by Australian teenagers per year, enjoying a predominant position compared to Pizza and Hamburgers which only were chosen no more than 20 times.
While in the next two decades, it’s apparently that both Pizza and Hamburgers experienced sharp increase. Gradually, Hamburgers’ increase speed turned slow and leveled off 100 times in 1995. Compared with Hamburgers, Pizza enjoyed a lower frequency and kept a moderate increase throughout the whole process and finally leveled out 85 times approximately at the same year.
Inversely, it can be found that the consumption times of the Fish and Chips appeared a dramatic drop of 60 times approximately. And finally there were only about 40 times in 2000. Though there were fluctuations during this process, it didn’t change the general decrease trend during the period from 1975 to 2000. The Fish and Chips was replaced by Hamburgers and Pizza to occupy the dominant status.
All in all, both of Pizza and Hamburgers’ consume frequencies had obvious increases from 1975 to 2000. While it’s also apparently that the Fish and Chips suffered a sales decline at the same time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Sheetal Bataniya | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | asdasdasd | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Ashley Cheung | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | iamkristinjoi | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | Bao Trang | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, finally, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33628318584 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86292760163 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566371681416 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7965924837 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.636363636 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255389847953 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101295193623 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168657198588 0.0843802449381 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188088895365 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.205190105632 0.0819641961636 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.